| 1 | 
  
   Strategic Assessment and Preliminary Draft PlanPrepared by Ray Uzwyshyn, Web ServicesFor Richter Library Web Committee2003 | 
 
  | 2 | 
  
   This strategic assessment surveys the current state of the Otto Richter
       Library Website
 
 Makes recommendations for future design, development, administration and
       resource needs
 
 | 
 
  | 3 | 
  
   Initiate and Identify mandates
 
 Assess internal/external factors surrounding the present site’s
       development
 
 Focus strategies for web committee discussion regarding possible
       directions for the Website’s future | 
 
  | 4 | 
  
   Pro-Activity
 
 Assessment of external influences impinging on the website’s development
 
 Recognize the need for collaborative and progressive change
 
 Genesis of Policy Documents
 
 | 
 
  | 5 | 
  
   Written as Organic working document (draft) to be drafted into policy
 
 Oriented towards the web committee and other interested parties input
       and amendments
 
 From a consultative perspective focusing from the web team’s charge | 
 
  | 6 | 
  
   The Richter Web site is a significant point-of-contact for users
       accessing library resources and services. The Web site’s functionality
       can contribute to (or hinder) a user’s capability to utilize the library
       successfully. Enhancing and improving the library’s Web site requires
       the focused efforts of a team of library faculty and staff. | 
 
  | 7 | 
  
   The charge for the Web Team is to serve as the editorial board for the
       library’s Web site. The Web Team has approval over the content and
       design of the top-level pages of the site. The Web Team is responsible
       for coordinating the overall organization and presentation of networked
       information resources and services via the Web site. | 
 
  | 8 | 
  
   Website is an amalgam of several university library and departmental
       sites linked through Richter’s unique and central status
 
 Historically, web presence began in early 90’s and was managed,
       maintained and designed by single person. | 
 
  | 9 | 
  
   The library’s web presence has grown exponentiallyWeb administrative and departments requesting developmental assistance
       has equally  expanded.Human resource component and planning (Policy) infrastructure to
       maintain this larger presence has not accompanied this expansion. | 
 
  | 10 | 
  
   Design: Loose rather than larger thought out application of visual
       metaphor, graphic innovation, style sheets and formsProgramming: combination of HTML with various database driven backend
       technologiesMultimedia: sporadic use throughout the siteInformation architecture: base structure in place(time to more closely investigate this structure as starting point for
       the next level) | 
 
  | 11 | 
  
   Series of Initial web committee brainstorming meetings should be
       initiated.
 
 Parallel library website development and other forward looking
       directions should be explored
 
 Supplemental reports from various web committee members regarding
       recommendations for features should be initiated | 
 
  | 12 | 
  
   Work with ideas of organic growth
 
 innovation
 
 Active change
 
 Experimentation Encouraged on Micrological LevelGenesis of Future Policy (Adherence to Policy) | 
 
  | 13 | 
  
   
 
 Factors in the library’s external environment influencing the library’s
       site development | 
 
  | 14 | 
  
   Library FacultyStaffDepartmental NeedsInstitutional NeedsAdministrative NeedsUser Needs | 
 
  | 15 | 
  
   Budgetary Constraints
 
 Human Resources
 
 Time Constraints related to Human Resources | 
 
  | 16 | 
  
   Human Resource Continuous LearningTechnology required in order to accomplish initiatives (new servers,
       software, hardware)Limitations built into technology (download times, modem speeds, browser
       compatibility issues) | 
 
  | 17 | 
  
   University of Miami Socio-Cultural Location and Visual Implications
 
 South Florida
 
 Cuban/Hispanic Speaking Population
 
 South American Border/Boundary Area | 
 
  | 18 | 
  
   
 
 University of Miami Faculty and Student Use
 
 Usability Studies: Who exactly are the users and how/where/why and when
       is the site being used? | 
 
  | 19 | 
  
   
 The University of Miami Web committee sees the university’s web presence
       as moving towards a more pronounced marketing/advertising focus
       (attracting students to the university) | 
 
  | 20 | 
  
   Web Service under or minimally staffedSingle allocated employee for daily administration, maintenance,
       coordination long term design and developmentOne person on library catalogAncillary Specialized projects personUncoordinated student assistants from various departments working on web
       concerns | 
 
  | 21 | 
  
   While resources are present in larger environment, there is no dedicated
       web lab or budget assigned to web resources or a continuous learning
       environment
 
 Current Web strategy works in defense (keep up as much as possible with
       daily requests and without larger policy to fall back on)
 
 | 
 
  | 22 | 
  
   
 
 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats | 
 
  | 23 | 
  
   Mapped out structure/foundational placement of library services within a
       larger siteTreasure trove of bibliographic and human resource riches with regards
       to possibilities for providing information resources to students and
       faculty (i.e. Cuban Heritage, Research/Ed Services)Combined Power of a Lobbying Force Web Team to Produce, Market and
       Implement Site wide Policies to Larger Library Faculty | 
 
  | 24 | 
  
   Lack of Human ResourcesLack of Site-wide Policy with Regard to Design IssuesLack of Policy for submitting RequestsLack of Long Term Planning StrategyLack of Patron usability studiesPoor workflow (Policy) regarding Content/Design duties of Web Services | 
 
  | 25 | 
  
   New Technological opportunities position the library with regards to the
       wider sphere of media rich technologies and cutting edge design
 
 The Web team can be designed to develop as an innovative think tank for
       incubating ideas regarding website innovation and open forum for
       experimentation while setting a firm foundation through development of
       future policies | 
 
  | 26 | 
  
   Unpredictable Nature of Internet (Bandwidth Limitations)Lack of Human ResourcesMiscommunication between departments, lack of following policies
       regarding delegation of authority for pages content/design of siteLack of Research/Development/Beta Version (Experimental) Time for Site
       Designs | 
 
  | 27 | 
  
   Service Goal: To provide a leading edge library website for users
       accessing resources and services.Human Resource Goal: to develop staff infrastructure capable of
       implementing such a website with a longer term visionAdministrative Goal: to make funding needs explicit (budget allocation)
       and create a policy structure which must be followed by all
       departments/bodies/etc. | 
 
  | 28 | 
  
   1.1 Site Wide Redesign (year time line)Forward looking perspectiveAttention to issues of design aestheticsAttention to issues of multimedia(Flash, motion graphics, sound, video components, e-reference service) | 
 
  | 29 | 
  
   2.1
 
 To develop a tiered technical staff capable of implementing and
       maintaining a large university website and internally training a next
       tier of student assistants | 
 
  | 30 | 
  
   3.1 To educate library staff and web committee members on current design
       trends, visual literacy and design technology so library science
       competencies can be placed in better dialogue with web concerns to make
       judgments | 
 
  | 31 | 
  
   4.1 
 To manage day to day concerns and requests within a policy
       followed and defined workflow (i.e. feedback forms) and in an innovative
       manner beneficial to the library and university mandates
 | 
 
  | 32 | 
  
   5.1 
 To make administration and wider university links aware of new
       technological possibilities so that proactive planning can be engendered
 | 
 
  | 33 | 
  
   6.1 
 To initiate, develop and implement a series of usability studies
       to gain a better understanding of library user population needs
 | 
 
  | 34 | 
  
   
    Development of Policy Infrastructure
 Adequate and Trained Staff    Appropriate Technology   Adequate Time for Staff | 
 
  | 35 | 
  
   Strategies later become policies that guide decisions, structures and
       rules that define institutions
 
 Web committee should begin by focusing on strategies, objectives and
       issues that will later become policy
 
 Individual departments should be informed about this purpose and outside
       opinions solicited and gathered | 
 
  | 36 | 
  
   Review for next draft to solicit opinions, additions and independent
       assessments for improvement (formal voting structure?)Recommendations of Senior ManagementPreliminary beta experimentation stage with various pages (i.e. home
       page, specific departmental initiatives)Larger Site Design timelines begunWeb Usability Studies | 
 
  | 37 | 
  
   Strategic Planning to initiate larger ‘followed’ web policiesAwareness of increasingly technologically mediated realityUM Librarians and libraries place within this realityWeb Presence as front line vanguard on a leading edge which others
       follow. | 
 
  | 38 |  |